.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Dilettante's Diary: the internal dialogue of a hedonist bluestocking.

I am a dilettante. I know quite a bit about a lot of things, but I don't know enough to be an expert on anything. I have a very sensual, hedonistic nature, but I am also a thinker, and I aim one day to be worthy of the label 'bluestocking', despite its pejorative connotations.

This is my journal, which, delightfully enough, doesn't have to go wherever I go, but is accessible from nearly everywhere I am.

Tuesday, April 26, 2005

Hyacinths for the soul

God I love spending time with Rob. Every time we get together, we always end up saying how we really wish we did it more often. There is this connection between us, it is something almost (dare I say it? *cringe*) spiritual, something on an 'energy' level rather than a 'chemistry' level. When we talk, we connect. I mean really connect. There are no misunderstandings. We speak in metaphors and similies, we talk of our abilities to reconsile paradox without rejecting it. We speak of living in the moment, of being aware, of being empathetic and contemplative, of being observers, of that self-awareness that makes us realize that even in a room full of people interested in engaging us, we can be alone, our own islands--entertaining our inner critics. We can use something from the Bagavad Gita, or the Diamond Sutra, or Nietzsche, Dante, Shakespeare, or Joseph Campbell to illustrate a point, without worrying that the other is missing it and needing an explanation. There is no need to talk down on a more mundane level. We can reach spiritual and philosophical heights that are just so rare in daily life. I almost always leave his company feeling uplifted, no matter how deep or dark the subjects of our conversations.

Rob and I talked tonite of many things. We talked about the difficulty of living a life (especially a rich internal one) that does not fit between the lines, that cannot be defined. About how disconcerting it is when you realize that, for most people, the answer to the question "What do you do?" is also the answer to the question "Who am I?" (What do you do? I am a lawyer/doctor/programmer)

We talked about just being what we are and our awareness that the world could benefit from more people who are process-oriented, rather than goals-oriented, people who are contemplators, rather than consumers. We are both life-long students, we both wish that it was possible, in today's world, to define one's self publicly as a philosopher or student of life without sounding absurd or lofty. We wish that it was legitimate to be a Thinker without having to be a member of the Academy or some Washington think-tank.

We talked about seeing the world differently, about noticing energy levels, about the consciousness we have that humanity is teetering on the edge of a precipice, and we need to leap into the next level of our evolution, or fall.

We talked about the undefinables of our more meaningful relationships, how, in describing our connections to our friends, sometimes people think we are talking about a lover. And about the pros and cons of taking friends as lovers. We talked about romance and love and how so many people have this idea that there is one perfect person out there who can be all things for them, connecting deeply on all levels: physical, mental, emotion, and spiritual. We've both found three of the four in one person, but we have no hopes or expectations of four out of four. We are both aware that one of the reasons why we have people in our lives is because the combinations of the different affinities fulfill us on all those levels, in ways that one person cannot.

We talked about how much we enjoy each other's company, and those who are like-minded, how renewing it is. And how sometimes we need it so desperately, because there is such a sense of separatness and detachment sometimes, and how it tends to grow as we realize how foreign we are to the mainstream. I told him he was one of my hyacinths. He asked what I meant and I quoted him this:

If of thy mortal goods thou art bereft,
And of thy meager store two loaves alone to thee are left,
Sell one, and with the dole
Buy hyacinths to feed thy soul.
(Sheikh Muslih-uddin Saadi Shirazi, The Gulistan of Saadi)


And finally, we talked about needing breaks, the need for solitude. Yes, the allure of solitude. But that is a post for another day.

9 Comments:

Blogger MarkJD said...

A strange thing to wish to define yourself as a thinker, but then be upset at how the world wants to take that label. For a person who likes solitude you care an awful lot what others think. There is truth and there is perception. If I wanted to be a philosopher/student of life/thinker, whatever, I'd really not care what others thought of my path.

I think you wish to be perceived as that more than you wish to truely be it. It is much of the reason you quote so many people, throw names around, and try to be well-read. Do you feel dumb at times? Did you feel naive growing up? Just wondering where this need to appear this way comes from. The narcissism you mentioned before goes hand in hand with overcompensation for the opposite feeling. Those who boast feel both superior and inferior at once.

6:29 AM, April 27, 2005  
Blogger KR said...

You obviously did not understand what I posted about, but then, you aren't meant to. This is my blog, not yours. It is written for my benefit, and that you are reading it matters very little to me. If you want to engage me in a dialogue on the nature of Reality versus inner reality, Truth versus perception, or the challenges of being a wage slave who thinks, you are welcome to email me.

As far as your second paragraph goes, again, you amuse me. You are showing your amateur agent provacateur psychology again. If you knew me RL you would know that I deliberately skew how people in general perceive me, preferring to remain below the attention-radar. Hence, my amusement. At 37 years of age, I am beyond the stage of mewling about insecurity and identity angst -- you will get past it too (I've read your blog). I quote parts of conversations because I want to record it, so when I go back and read, I can recall all the other things I chose not to write down. I have been journalling for 25 years. This is my style. Do I feel dumb at times? Of course. I am humbled by daily life. I do not pretend to know everything -- I simply want to know everything. Did I feel naieve growing up? No, I didn't feel naieve. I was naieve. I grew up on a commune. Entering mainstream childhood when I started public school at 10 was a real shocker. My naivete ended when I was 11, though. A child who experiences sexual trama enters adulthood jaded and cynical. I've spent my adult life slowly reclaiming the wonder and joy of trust and simplicity in a dark and complex world.

7:50 AM, April 27, 2005  
Blogger MarkJD said...

Alright, I'll quit commenting here.

9:44 AM, April 27, 2005  
Blogger KR said...

Thank you.

I understand that you are training for law, that you are prepped for adversarial dialogue and debate. As someone trained to think critically, you notice holes in logic, and I wouldn't be surprised if you were also taught how to exploit emotional triggers, to push buttons in the hopes of provoking a response that will provide useful information (or perhaps it just comes naturally). I've seen your comments on your friend's blogs, and I have cringed for some of them, and for you, because you think you are being helpful, or worse, insightful, but you are not. You have too little experience of the world to know what you think you are talking about. Your certitude is hubris, and I understand. You will outgrow it as certainly as you did childhood.

My weblog was not intended for public consumption. It is about me, in all my flawed, outrageous humanity. My strengths, my foibles, my memories, my experiences. It was stumbled upon by some people recently and I've been trying not to let the knowledge that someone is reading my soul uninvited bother me. I read other's souls, and try to be kind and encouraging in my comments to strangers. I do not know them and so I do not know what effect my words will have.

It is one thing to make the kinds of comments that you do on your friend's blogs. They know the context from which they spring: they know where you coming from and what your intentions are.

Your comments don't bother me. What bothers me is that I know some others, some fragile bloggers, for whom such arrogant comments would be devestating. Again, I _think_ that you _intend_ to be insightful and helpful, but in effect all you are really doing is acting like a dog -- pissing on whatever he comes across in order to mark that he was there.

You make assumptions and act on those assumptions and, honey, you have no idea what you are talking about. You come across as an ass, instead of the thoughtful, sensitive, loving person your blog indicates you think you are or wish to be. I am being direct in the hopes that you will understand, not that I intend to be hurtful, that that I am trying to show you that (assuming you aren't an asshole doing it deliberately) your words have the potential to hurt people who do not have healthy egos. Fortunately, much to your annoyance, I am a competant, self-confident woman with a very healthy ego.

12:42 AM, April 29, 2005  
Blogger Wayne World said...

Kelly,

Don't you have more to say to this fellow?

1:04 PM, April 29, 2005  
Blogger KR said...

Any recommendations, SB?

2:50 PM, April 29, 2005  
Blogger Wayne World said...

Yea, tell him to kiss this ...(().

10:00 AM, April 30, 2005  
Blogger KR said...

Kiss the Eye of Horus?
That is what that looks like to me -- when I turn my head ;)
But ok: CD, will you kiss SB's this, whatever his this is?

11:08 AM, April 30, 2005  
Blogger Wayne World said...

Kelly, tell me that you don't see BUTTCHEEKS.Look real close (() .Now , stare at it and think of buttcheeks.

5:42 PM, May 04, 2005  

Post a Comment

<< Home